Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 6th September 2010

45ft mobile mast bid blasted by angry residents

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 May 2008
FURIOUS residents have attacked plans to construct a 45ft mobile phone mast just yards from their homes.
Mobile phone giant Vodafone has applied to Gosport Borough Council to put up a mast in Carisbrooke Road, Peel Common.

But residents say it will be an eyesore and potentially damaging to health.

Engineer Brian Hart, 69, of Honeysuckle Close, sai
d: 'All the people I've spoken to are against this. It is not the right area for it at all.

'It's right next to the Carisbrooke open space where people go for walks and have picnics.

'It's definitely going to have an adverse impact on the landscape.'
Tina Thornhill, 44, landlady of the Carisbrooke Arms, which is 30ft from the proposed mast site, said: 'I think it's disgusting. It's going to be right outside the pub. We've been trying very hard to make the area look nice over the last two-and-a-half years and they want to do this.'

Residents also fear the mast could interfere with the radio equipment of planes at the nearby Daedalus airfield at Lee-on-the-Solent

But Jason Wakeford, a spokesman for the Civil Aviation Authority, said there was no danger of the mast having an effect.

Vodafone spokesman Ally Stevens also reassured residents that they were not at risk. The company also refuted claims the mast would be an eyesore, saying it would be similar to other lamp-posts in the area.

She said: 'Since 2000 there have been more than 30 independent reviews of the potential effects of signals from base stations on health.

'These reviews have concluded there is no evidence of any adverse health effects.

'The proposed installation is similar in appearance to existing street furniture in the area.'

Residents can comment on the application until June 10.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2008 10:33 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

S Densley,

London 27/05/2008 17:30:14
Ally Stevens from vodaphone says there are 30 independent reviews that conclude there is no evidence of any adverse health effects. I'd like to know which reviews these are. They certainly didn't include the EU Reflex report or the recent Bioinitiative report. It seems all 30 of them must have missed the hundreds of published scientific papers that have been building up for over a decade that demonstrate clear links between mobile phone radiation at below thermal levels and detrimental health effects (including cancer) - some of which describe the mechanisms by which non thermal effects can cause a wide range of problems. Perhaps he'd like to show us these 30 reports. In return I'll happily send the editors a sample of peer reviewed published scientific research. Let’s see is who is accurately representing the real science.
2

Tom 24,

27/05/2008 20:39:05
I bet the locals will be the first people to moan when they can't get signal on their mobile phone because their moaning has taken all the mobile phone masts down,
3

S Densley,

London 28/05/2008 10:20:20
It might be frustrating having to use a land line Tom. Do you think it might be as frustrating as having cancer? Unfortunately this is the choice that some people are unwilling to face up to.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.