Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Thursday, 16th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the NS-City site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Defence company's privatisation attacked by MPs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2008
Workers at Qinetiq sites around Portsmouth face a morale-sapping future after a parliamentary committee today attacked the firm's privatisation, according to a local MP.
Portsmouth South Lib Dem Mike Hancock said staff working at Fort Cumberland, Portsdown Hill, and Gosport would feel the effects of senior civil servants making huge profits during the sell-off of the former Defence Evaluation and Research Agency.

According to the report published today by the Public Accounts Committee, the Ministry of Defence behaved like 'an innocent at a table of card-sharps' when it arranged the sale to the Carlyle Group.

Spending watchdogs the National Audit Office calculated the taxpayer lost out to the tune of £90 million from the part-privatisation.

Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock said: 'Qinetiq has already had a bad press and this will make things harder for workers.

'I sat on the defence committee and we hauled these guys over the coals for making an absolute fortune, but the government did not listen.'

The report says the 2003 sale of a minority stake in the company happened when the market for technology stock was weak and the Carlyle Group was offered an 'unbeatable hand' when other bidders were eliminated.

The MoD began the sale before Qinetiq's most important contract had been finalised, making it difficult to judge the company's value.

This allowed Carlyle to negotiate a £55 million reduction in its £374 million offer after being appointed preferred bidder.

The report also accused Qinetiq's directors of 'profiteering at the expense of the taxpayer' after they were allowed to negotiate their own incentive packages with Carlyle before it was named as preferred bidder.

At the date of the flotation of the company in 2006, the top 10 managers held shares worth £107 million for an investment of just £540,000 – making £200 for every £1 invested, compared with £9 for the taxpayer.

Mr Hancock said: 'There will be a very bad association with the name Qinetiq as a result of this.'

The privatisation has to date generated £576 million in proceeds for the taxpayer.

Committee chairman Edward Leigh said: 'The privatisation of Qinetiq has been successful in protecting the viability of this business of importance to UK defence interests. But the MOD conducted the deal like an innocent at a table of cardsharps, with the taxpayer the fall guy losing out on nearly £100 million.

'The senior public servants managing QinetiQ behaved dishonourably. They sold the idea to the MoD of privatising the business without explaining they stood to benefit.'

The full article contains 430 words and appears in NS-City newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 June 2008 9:59 AM
  • Source: NS-City
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Inamess2,

10/06/2008 14:58:06
This story seems to have a parrellel with Portsmouth City Councils negociations over the Northern Quarter and once again the name of MP Hancock crops up, taking a different role of asking questions, rather than being asked them.It is also ironic that the City Council are at this very moment in dispute with the very same Qinetic over access to the development at Fort Cumberland, situated in the Eastney and Craneswater Ward.Do we have any Councillors that may have any undeclared interests in or with Qinetic?
2

this-isnt-news,

10/06/2008 23:48:56
^^^Sorry what? Yawn :-0
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.