Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Wednesday, 19th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anger over change in plans to build homes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
Plans to allow thousands of homes to be built without the necessary infrastructure in place have been met with uproar.
Despite inspectors last year recommending that new roads, schools, doctors and dentists should be funded when thousands of new homes are built across the area, the government now looks set to go against this advice.
Hazel Blears, minister in charge of communities and local government, is suggesting a series of changes to the South East plan – a blueprint for the region over the next 18 years.
Her changes would see infrastructure no longer a condition of development.
Instead she is suggesting that councils should perform a test – first seeing if they could make roads less busy by bringing in measures such as tolls or charging businesses to allow their employees to park on their premises.
Only if these two fail is Ms Blears suggesting new infrastructure should be pursued.
She is also suggesting that the target number of homes councils set for sites within their districts should be a minimum, leaving developers free to ask to build more.
The Partnership for Urban South Hampshire, an influential body comprising local council leaders, is furious.
Push chairman Sean Woodward, also leader of Fareham Borough Council, said: 'We've produced enough evidence to support the need for adequate infrastructure investment, which the government seems to be ignoring.
'Quite frankly, if there's no new infrastructure then we do not want any new development.'
Push also has severe concerns about Ms Blears' suggested amendment to house building numbers, making them a minimum or 'floor number'.
Cllr Woodward added: 'Each council is looking at potential sites and setting numbers for how many dwellings could feasibly be built there.
'We set these targets with local knowledge – something the minister doesn't have. It could cause huge problems within districts.'
Leader of Portsmouth City Council Cllr Gerald Vernon-Jackson said: 'You've got to have infrastructure in place first, before any development takes place.
'The government needs to get its act together.'
The department of communities and local government would not comment on the individual amendments but said no decision has been made and a consultation is under way.
Infrastructure is also one of the key demands of The News Save Our South campaign.

The full article contains 384 words and appears in The News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 8:03 AM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Scourge,

Portsmouth 13/10/2008 14:23:54
More evidence as I have consistently stated on these pages of political engineering by the Labour Party. The reqirement for cramming all these houses in the south east cannot be justified by any statistics provided by this Government. In fact, in their March 2007 White Paper on the subject, the largest requirement by far is for immigration (32%), the same immigration they are telling the Electorate they intend to put a stop to. Clearly they have no intention wahtsoever of doing this or there would be no reason at all for this large number of new houses.
What is really going on then? The south east mainly votes Conservative - cram the majority of immigrants in this area, provide lots of low cost housing and who are they going to vote for - Labour. This will once and for all change the voting pattern in the South East from Conservative to Labour - this is what is behind it all. No funds for infrastructure means they want to get these houses in as soon as possible, as they do not have the funds available, because of their incompetent economic management. Wake up please voters to what is really going on and get them out!
2

digicom,

Portsmouth 13/10/2008 18:03:25
Looks to me that you have hit the nail on the head once again Scourge. Can you please let us know who you are, because you have a large following out here. I see Gordon Brown is now preening himself as the Saviour of the financial world. Well just let me say that all the recent financial mayhem is a direct result of his incompetent economic policies - let rip the money supply and make sure the people who are running financial regulation are both incompetent and beholden to Government dictat, to prolong a non-sustainable economic debt boom. Let me tell you all that this mayhem is not over and that there is much worse to come and we are all going to be much poorer as a result.
We all remember Blair standing at the Despatch Box on many occasions saying 'No more boom no more bust!'
This is an end of cycle bust and it will put Labour out of contention for office for decades. Thank goodness. So coming back to the points you make Scourge. I doubt they will be in office to implement their 'political engineering' housing policy in the South East.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.