Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Wednesday, 19th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the NS-City site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Builder must keep landscape pledge



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
03 May 2008
A DEVELOPER could face legal action if it doesn't plant a barrier of trees around its housing site.
Persimmon Homes had agreed to put in a 130ft 'green' buffer between its 215-home development in Whiteley and an existing road.

But more than two years on, residents and ward councillors are still waiting for the firm to keep its promise. Now Fareham Borough Council is demanding the developer acts, and says it will consider legal action if the company fails to do so.

Peter Johnson lives in Caigers Green – the road which backs on to the development. The 75-year-old said: 'We moved into our home after the development had begun.

'Had we known the company wasn't going to actually build this barrier, we probably would have moved elsewhere. We were hoping for some lovely trees to look out on, and for it to create a bit of privacy, but instead it looks an eyesore. It's an absolute mess.'

Gordon Davies, 63, also of Caigers Green, said: 'If the developer had done what it promised, the trees would be flourishing by now.'

Fareham Borough Council has written to Persimmon demanding action.

Sarisbury councillor David Swanbrow said: 'I've been on at the developers for two years now. It planted some shrubs last year but didn't fence them off and so deer got in and ate them.

'The plants were not maintained and most died.

'Now it's just been left, with weeds all over it. The developer is breaking a legal agreement here as well as letting down residents.'

The Persimmon Homes development in Whiteley was given the go-ahead in January 2005. The tree buffer was part of the planning agreement.

After being contacted by The News, the developer said it would look to sort the problem out once and for all.

Stephen Bennett, construction director for Persimmon Homes South Coast, said: 'We have been liaising with a landscaping contractor and will ensure that the additional planting will take place within the next week.

'Along with the planting work, we will also be carrying out a thorough clean up of the site, removing any debris and rubbish that has collected.'


The full article contains 369 words and appears in NS-City newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 May 2008 7:58 AM
  • Source: NS-City
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Hampshire Bus,

Whiteley 03/05/2008 12:32:14
The builders put up a deer proof fence. In the wrong place. Then moved it. However, didn't stop the deer!
2

Another Whiteley Resident,

03/05/2008 21:03:05
Not being funny but "I've been on at the developers for two years now." - and he was voted back in????
3

Real Whiteley resident,

03/05/2008 22:46:00
With 82% of the vote - obviously a popular choice with only 374 people out of over 5,000 electors voting against him. Inarguable but don't let that stop you.
4

Another Whiteley Resident,

03/05/2008 23:55:38
And that's a reflection of performance, with regard to the story above?

Remind us again of what the turnout was in this ward and what percentage that is of the Whiteley side? Not a lot according to the FBC website.

Votes just count those who turn up (and some of those who give their vote away but that's another story), and that's about it, I'm afraid. They're not necessarily representative of any opinion apart from that maybe 60% of Fareham residents can't be bothered.
5

Real Whiteley resident,

04/05/2008 09:36:48
I see that most of Whiteley's residents live in the Fareham side and that those residents form half of the Sarisbury ward. And your point was?
6

Another Whiteley Resident,

04/05/2008 10:33:37
I see you're going around the houses to avoid the main point again. Sigh...

Actually, the Whiteley split is more even than you try to make out. And I would also suggest that Whiteley (Fareham) voters are outnumbered by their ward neighbours by 5:3. That doesn't alter the fact that 2/3rds of voters didn't vote for a Tory. The fact that they didn't vote full stop is a sad indictment of politics and general apathy. It also doesn't alter the fact that despite the fact that a Tory councillor has been on at this developer for two years, according to his own admission, he hasn't actually got anywhere. Could anyone else have made a difference? Guess we'll never know unless voters get off their backsides.
7

Real Whiteley resident,

04/05/2008 10:57:46
Whiteley Winchester electorate 2284, Whiteley Fareham electorate 2449 so you can't even get that right. Really do need to try harder - much harder. So where were we? Oh yes only 374 voters out of over 5000 voted against Cllr Swanbrow who received 82% of the vote. And Liberal Cllr Achwal? Becomes a councillor with just 551 people supporting her. Three quarters of the electors did not vote Liberal but got a Liberal.
8

Another Whiteley Resident,

04/05/2008 11:16:34
Spoken like a true Tory, eh? Like I said - pretty much an even split, and with Whiteley going North, only likely to get bigger on the WCC side very soon. By the way - only 374 voters out of over 5000 voted against Swanbrow? How the heck do you work THAT out when over 3000 didn't vote at all??? Try harder - much much harder! Hope you're not a Tory activist, with maths like that - they're not having a great time of it at present, according to the News.
9

Another Whiteley Resident,

04/05/2008 11:20:34
Anyway, where were we? Oh yes - TWO YEARS??? It only takes eight to build a bus link!
10

Real Whiteley resident,

04/05/2008 12:16:17
When in a hole better stop digging. "Outnumberd 5:3 - with maths like that you must be a Liberal! Better stop trying ay all - I can feel the heat from here. Best go back to photographing innocent motorists.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.