Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Care bill change leaves sick and elderly in shock



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 July 2008
ELDERLY, ill and frail people face paying up to £10,000 a year to get care services provided for them in their own homes.
Portsmouth City Council has said it will stop subsidising non-residential services such as nursing, washing, dressing and cleaning.

About 270 people across the city will be forced to fork out up to a maximum of £190 a week more than they do now fo
r the same level of care.

The move is expected to net the cash-strapped council about £300,000 a year as part of a raft of money-saving measures designed to claw back £9m of debt over the next three years.

Muriel Deacon, president of Portsmouth Pensioners' Association, said: 'This beggars belief.

'Older people who use this kind of care only do so if they really need it – they are usually in dire straits. I am very sad that people who are usually quite fragile are being told they will have to manage on their own.'

The council's previous charging system meant the public purse paid for any care costing more than £10.40 an hour.

Health and social care bosses agreed to scrap this and instead demand that anyone with assets other than their home worth more than £22,250 must pay the full cost of care.

Mrs Deacon said people's care could suffer if they were forced to scrimp and save.

'One hour of care a day may not seem a lot but for people who depend on the service to maintain independence in their own homes it can be quite devastating to lose it if they can't afford it,' she said.

She said people shouldn't have to spend their savings.

'Now £22,250 is not a lot of money – people with this money weren't given it as a present, they worked for it and have paid taxes on it,' she added.

The council says the changes are in line with Department of Health guidance.

Peter Pennekett, the council's social care accountant, said only a very few people would be paying hundreds of pounds more than they are now. Most people would be paying around £30 to £40 a week extra.

Councillor Mike Park, Tory spokesman for health and social care, said: 'I take the opinion that anyone who can pay should pay. I do not see any other way of dealing with the financial situation.'

New clients will start paying immediately while existing clients will start paying from April next year.

alex.forsyth

@thenews.co.uk



The full article contains 431 words and appears in The News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2008 11:14 AM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

David Knight,

Copnor 05/07/2008 19:23:47
Councillor Mike Park states - "Anyone who can pay should pay - I do not see any other way" Try looking to Scotland Mike where anyone who can pay gets it absolutely free using the taxes we pay - Get that money back and use it or are the elderly in Scotland worth more than the elderly in England? I don't think so, Do you?
2

digicom,

Portsmouth 06/07/2008 10:05:07
It is a question of prorities. You can either look after the elderly, as you should in a civilised society or, you can allow the politicians and buraucrats to run riot with our taxes to maximise their own pay and pensions as they do in Portsmouth. Over 60% of our council tax goes towards the pay and indexed linked pensions of these self serving, underachievers. This is unsustainable and the real reason why services are being cut, even after our council tax has risen more than 100% in 10 years. This bill will only get bigger as they continue to make their number one priority themselves and their fringe benefits.
We have had enough of these 'SNOUTS IN THE TROUGH.'
3

Smileydee,

Portsmouth 07/07/2008 10:21:34
This current administration is not in the real world. I urged years ago that more should be invested in care of the elderly, day care, residential care and other aspects related to Social Services. Instead we have a failing depleted system that discriminates against the most vulnerable in society. A disgrace is not a strong enough word. As for the complacency of Mike Parks .. it beggars belief. Instead of whining "the changes are in line with Department of Health guidance" he as our representative should be telling the Government that is is not acceptable.
A total shambles our Council should be ashamed of their performance
4

Scourge,

Porstmouth 10/07/2008 13:45:52
'Hear Hear' Smileydee, Digicom and David Knight. This is a disgrace and the outcome of a political system that is out of control, and, that has become so corrupt in pusuit of its own self interest that the most vulnerable in our society, the eldely, are put at risk. No wonder society is in such decline as a result of these self serving incompetent nonentities, who are prepared to cut services, whilst at the same time awarding themselves unsustainable pay and pension rises.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.