Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Wednesday, 15th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the NS-City site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fraudster will be paying debt until he is 110



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 March 2008
A benefit fraudster who pocketed more than £55,000 of taxpayers' money has been given 52 years to pay back the cash.
Graham Waterman, pictured on page one, would be 110 years old by the time he has paid back all the money that he fraudulently claimed over a nine-year period.

The 58-year-old is paying back £10 per week to the Department for Work and Pensions and
£12 per week to Portsmouth City Council – most of which is being taken from the benefits he legitimately claims.

He has already paid back £780 to the DWP.

Today, pressure groups described the arrangement as absurd.

Mark Wallace, campaigns director from the Taxpayers Alliance said: 'This is a shambles. The least the authorities should do is make sure the scheme is practical for the repayment of the money. The chance of getting this money back is minimal. With this absurd settlement taxpayers have been let down.'

Between 1997 and 2006 ,Waterman claimed £55,813 in income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit that he was not entitled to by failing to tell the authorities that his wife Linda, was working as a carer. He also didn't mention that he was working for two months at the beginning of 2006.

At Portsmouth Crown Court Waterman, of Lumsden Road, Eastney, Portsmouth admitted eight counts of furnishing a false statement so as to obtain benefit.

Recorder Lucinda Davis imposed a 10-month prison sentence suspended for 18 months on Waterman – and said she had spared him an immediate prison sentence for his wife's sake.

The court heard Mrs Waterman, who was diagnosed with cancer in 2006, needed around the clock care, which was provided by her husband.

Waterman's barrister Anthony Bailey told the court his client's initial claim for benefit was legitimate as he had health problems but he continued to claim when his circumstances changed.

Tony Nicholas, Portsmouth City Council's head of revenues and benefits said: 'This money has been defrauded and we're trying to get it back as quickly as we can. But the government's regulations say the maximum we can claim back is £12 a week.'

A spokeswoman for the DWP added: 'When people are convicted for benefit fraud, we always seek to recover that overpayment.

'We are determined to recoup the stolen money but we don't want to cause the person unnecessary suffering.'



The full article contains 407 words and appears in NS-City newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 March 2008 10:55 AM
  • Source: NS-City
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Chris 71,

Pompey 31/03/2008 16:51:58
This pay back is calculated on the benefit he will in future receive? Why doesn't he be made to get a job? Or stop ALL his benefit till he does. If he can't get a job get him out in the community working. At least he will be paying the debt back in that way. To assume he will be on benefits forever is a farce. And after all, its us taxpayers that pay his benefits so he can't lose can he?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.