Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Portsmouth could be next to axe speed camera funding



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
16 July 2008
Speed cameras could be axed amid fears they are soaking up large amounts of public cash while not being proven to have saved lives.
Portsmouth council leaders are considering cutting the £400,000 annual funding they give to speed cameras locally as the debate rages on as to whether there are better, cheaper ways to make the roads safer.

Senior council leaders have questioned t
he spending after a bust-up with the organisation which manages the camera network, the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Safer Roads Partnership, which they say has failed to tell them how many speeding tickets are being given out.

Leader of Portsmouth City Council Gerald Vernon-Jackson said: 'Six months ago we asked how many tickets were issued from different cameras.

'The partnership has refused to give us the data.

'I don't think it's acceptable that an organisation we give £400,000 a year to is not prepared to share information.

'At the moment I have no evidence it provides value for money at all.

'We will need to look very carefully at this. There are probably better ways of spending £400,000.'

His hardline approach comes after town bosses in Swindon threatened to stop funding Wiltshire and Swindon Safety Camera Partnership and look for more cost-effective ways of spending the cash.

Hampshire has 30 fixed camera sites operated by the partnership.

The biggest slice of the cash comes from Hampshire County Council – which contributes nearly £1.5m of its £2.5m government grant for road safety – but leaders there are solid in their support for the partnership.

Portsmouth City Council gives out almost £400,000, its total grant, while the Isle of Wight council hands over almost £330,000 and Southampton City Council stumps up £367,000.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Safer Roads Partnership spokesman Julian Hewitt said that the money funded more than just speed cameras, adding the success of the cameras in Portsmouth was demonstrated by falling road casualty figures.

'The measure of the success of speed cameras in Portsmouth is not to do with the number of tickets issued but the numbers of casualties reduced,' he said.

'In Portsmouth over the last three years up to March 2008 the number of collisions in which people were injured on our camera routes has fallen by 31 per cent.

'The partnership is in the process of seeking a meeting with Councillor Vernon Jackson to look at numbers of tickets issued at camera sites and to discuss any other concerns he may have.'

Spokesman for the Association of British Drivers Nigel Humphries said: 'Councils are pouring money down the drain that could be better spent on police patrols'



The full article contains 457 words and appears in The News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 July 2008 7:59 AM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

quattro,

16/07/2008 15:07:13
If the SCP weren't paying Road Safety Support Ltd a figure of up to £50K a year to deny people a fair trial, perhaps they would have a better reputation.

It's about time they got rid of all of these cameras, and gave us back our Police Force.
2

Smileydee,

Portsmouth 16/07/2008 16:45:10
Well if you are prepared to wine and dine our revered leader of the council he will agree to almost anything.
3

Bill Whitehead,

17/07/2008 12:25:01
Victoria:

Regardless of all the pro and anti camera arguments once you wittle it down there is only one comment necessary.

If I know where all the relevant cameras are and I'm aware of the reduction in traffic police since the proliferation of cameras.

What exactly would be slowing me down if I choose to speed?

All the time the government want to prosecute the wrong people, let them get on with it, it only takes a little homework to avoid speed camera prosecution entirely.
4

Pompey_BD,

Supersonic 22/07/2008 22:09:19
It's like the daft idea of making every residential road 20 MPH. It's UNPOLICABLE!! Therefore, UNENFORCABLE!!

Therefore, STUPID!

When will these people learn?

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.