Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the NS-City site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Vulture victims tally 139 – and £8,300 in fines



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 April 2008
A TOTAL of 139 drivers were caught speeding by the 'yellow vulture' speed cameras recently removed from the A27.
The motorists were all caught driving faster than the temporary 40mph limit on the stretch of road, where the limit is normally 70mph.

Each motorist will be receiving a £60 fine through the post and three points on their licence, meaning that the cameras are set to generate more than £8,300 for the government.

Six speed cameras, which clock the average speed of vehicles between two fixed points, were installed on January 6 on the A27 between Havant and Emsworth and were in operation around the clock.

Hampshire Safer Roads Partnership said the cameras were there to protect roadworkers as the Highways Agency embarked on a £5m scheme to install a new central reservation between Portsmouth and Warblington.

The cameras were taken down on April 1.

Today Hampshire Safer Roads Partnership described the figures as 'encouraging' because only about one driver a day was snapped breaking the law.

But critics said the scheme was simply a money-making ploy.

Brian MacDowall, from the Association of British Drivers, said: 'There is no overriding safety benefit to these cameras because the number of workers being hurt is so low and has very little to do with speed.

'They just add to congestion.

'It means the only possible purpose for these cameras is to raise revenue. These yellow vultures are quite a lucrative scheme it would appear.'

He added: 'I would imagine that many people caught were driving at night. It's nigh on impossible to see these cameras when it's dark because they are so small and hover high over the road.'

But Julian Hewitt, spokesman for the Hampshire Safer Roads Partnership, said: 'This is a very encouraging figure considering the busy nature of the A27.

'Motorists are to be congratulated on driving responsibly by keeping to the speed limit.

'During the roadworks there was lane narrowing, workers and equipment next to the carriageway and some of the usual safety measures removed.

'I think that the hazards in the roadworks were obvious to most road users, who knew that it was in their best interests, as well as the interests of others, to keep their speeds down.'

jeff.travis@thenews.co.uk

The full article contains 391 words and appears in NS-City newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 April 2008 7:50 AM
  • Source: NS-City
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

no 6,

Fareham 14/04/2008 09:10:06
Having driven along this road during the roadworks, somtimes seeing a workman behind the LARGE CONCRETE WALLS that had been erected, I must congratulate the council on another fundraising initiative and good pointer to other councils in the future wishing to make few quid !
2

Mike B,

portsmouth 14/04/2008 11:31:01
Just another way to screw the motorist,vultuers will be on evry road in ten years time.
I bet most of those cought were just a few MPH over the limit for a few seconds or the same at 4 in the morning.
3

MurF,

14/04/2008 12:44:15
no 6 - Please read the report above again. The fines go into Goverment Coffers..... Not Council Coffers. Your very wrong.
4

no 6,

Fareham 14/04/2008 12:55:07
Thank you MurF
I am in error.
Please read my comments to congratulate the Highways Agency.
5

Kevin George,

Greenville 14/04/2008 14:38:47
The reason for the speed limit is safety... if a van or truck passes a workman holding a hot cup of coffee at 70mph the resulting wind turbulence could spill said coffee and give him a nasty burn... this is less likely to happen at 40 mph, so productivity is increased.
6

Graham Wheatley,

Southsea 14/04/2008 19:04:08
Agreed.

'Productivity' would also be increased if work were to continue, in shifts, over the full 24 hour period.

The number of days taken to complete the work would therefore be reduced which, in turn, reduces the number of delayed journeys, which in turn, reduces the amount of wasted fuel, which in turn, reduces the amount of CO2 and NO2 emissions etc etc.

The only place where it would not be feasible for round-the-clock shifts to operate would be in proximity to residential accommodation (noise and dust factors).

ELSEWHERE IT SHOULD BE THE NORMAL WORKING PRACTICE AND SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACTS !

If this were the case, virtually all drivers would more readily accept the need for the restrictions being in place. At most work-sites, no work is actually taking place for c.12-16 hours of each 24 hour period. Madness.

7

Kevin George,

Greenville 14/04/2008 19:25:35
Steady Graham,
You are being both rational and intelligent in your thought train. These are 2 words that no longer exist in the UK when included in planning, development and construction projects. If you keep up with this kind of crazy unrestrained thought process, who knows where the UK would be. !! Sounds to me like you're one of those pinko's who wants a better place to live in...! :-)
8

Colin Walker,

17/04/2008 17:23:46
Has anyone considered how much it cost to set up, power, monitor, remove those cameras? Bet you it cost ten times what they brought in. although, like everyone else, if in a hurry I find the limits frustrating, I've also been driving in narrow lanes at a reasonable speed, only to have a lorry drive past six inches from my car at speed, with the air dam first pushing then pulling the car as it went past. It's ok to put a limit up and hope that drivers obey them, but the type who would drive at speed through these road works, do seem to believe that they are such good drivers that they don't need to slow down - therefore the cmeras are in place to try to ensure the road is asafer for the rest of us mere mortals, who perhaps know our limits better than they do!
9

,

19/04/2008 14:48:13
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
10

MurF,

21/04/2008 12:51:38
Your dead right Colin. We required a lower speed limit to justify the thiner lanes. I said this to all the others ages ago (on another story) , but no one listened. All the others are just worried about what time they get home in the evening, giving little respect to other road users!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.