DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 21/05/13
  • 9°C to 16°C Cloudy
  • Portsmouth 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Wednesday 22 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed23 mph

    Thursday 23 May

    Light showers

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low6°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed28 mph

    Friday 24 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low6°c

    Wind

    From North east

    Speed24 mph

    Saturday 25 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low8°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed20 mph

    Sunday 26 May

    Cloudy

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed20 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Addict in human rights case is jailed

A DRUG addict who failed to stop his flat being repossessed on human rights grounds has been locked up for theft.

Terry Miller, of Gibraltar Close in Fareham, was jailed for 12 weeks after admitting two counts of theft when he appeared at Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court.

The 30-year-old confessed to stealing £35 of meat from Co-op and £37 of lamb from Waitrose, both in Gosport, with Melanie Pocock.

The bench sentenced him to six weeks for each offence because of his long history of offending.

Pocock, 27, of Ham Lane in Gosport, was sentenced to four months in jail, suspended for a year, for her role in the thefts.

As reported yesterday, Fareham Borough Council won its case against Miller at the Court of Appeal.

Miller’s defence claimed that repossession of the flat breached his right to a private life, and he had been ‘exploited’ by others.

Three appeal judges disagreed with his defence.

During the hearing the flat was described as ‘a running sore of criminal behaviour’.

 
 
 

Back to the top of the page