DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 22/05/13
  • 6°C to 16°C Sunny spells
  • Portsmouth 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Thursday 23 May

    Light showers

    Temp

    High12°c

    Low5°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed29 mph

    Friday 24 May

    Light showers

    Temp

    High12°c

    Low6°c

    Wind

    From North

    Speed32 mph

    Saturday 25 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low8°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed20 mph

    Sunday 26 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed23 mph

    Monday 27 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed24 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Southsea charity fraudster is jailed for five months

A WOMAN who conned the elderly and the vulnerable out of money, claiming it was for charity, has been locked up.

Natalie Stewart, of Fawcett Road in Southsea, had gone door-to-door last June and July telling people she was going to take part in the Race for Life and convincing them to give her sponsorship money for it.

The 27-year-old pleaded guilty to 15 counts of fraud, and was jailed for four months, to run concurrent for each one. And she also admitted two counts of failing to surrender to custody, for which she was jailed for a further month at Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court.

The amounts she took ranged from £1 to £20 for a total of more than £150.

Thousands of people take part in the Race for Life each year around Southsea to raise money for Cancer Research UK.

At a previous hearing, Hugh Pringle, defending, had told the court: ‘The amount of money was unimportant compared to the nature of the offence and the vulnerability of the people targeted.’

 
 
 

Back to the top of the page