DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 26/05/13
  • 7°C to 17°C Sunny
  • Portsmouth 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Monday 27 May

    Sunny

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed23 mph

    Tuesday 28 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed18 mph

    Wednesday 29 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed16 mph

    Thursday 30 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High18°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed20 mph

    Friday 31 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High19°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed21 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Care home bid for Southbourne is turned down

CONTROVERSIAL plans to build a new care home, 40 assisted-living flats and 30 age-restricted homes have been turned down.

Chichester District Council said the plan for land north of Alfrey Close, Southbourne, near Emsworth, would result in an ‘institutional-style building’.

A report said any benefit in meeting housing targets were ‘outweighed by the environmental harm’.

The outline application was for a 60-bedroom care home, complete with a cafe, shop, hairdresser and community cinema, 40 assisted-living apartments and 30 age-restricted houses.

But officials said the development would result in the ‘piecemeal erosion’ of the strategic gap between Chichester and Emsworth.

How traffic would access the site through Alfrey Close was also a concern. Southbourne Parish Council had objected to the plan.

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page