DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 19/05/13
  • 11°C to 15°C Light rain
  • Portsmouth 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Monday 20 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low12°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed17 mph

    Tuesday 21 May

    Cloudy

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low8°c

    Wind

    From North

    Speed18 mph

    Wednesday 22 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed22 mph

    Thursday 23 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High14°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed24 mph

    Friday 24 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High14°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed21 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Homes plan refused due to ‘tight squeeze’

PLANS for two new homes on a plot in Widley were refused on the grounds it would be too cramped.

Proposals were presented to Havant Borough Council’s planning committee to demolish a two-bedroom detached bungalow in The Thicket.

It would be replaced by a pair of three-bedroom semi-detached bungalows with integral garages.

Widley Cllr Caren Tarrant pleaded with the committee to refuse the plans as they would be out of keeping with the local street scene.

Cllr Elaine Shimbart, who sits on the committee, said: ‘I’m really not happy given the size of the plot.

‘It’s going to end up looking very cramped and overdeveloped.’

But committee chairman Paul Buckley said: ‘At the moment it’s a big site. It’s bigger really than one small bungalow deserves to have.’

Concerns were also raised about getting vehicles safely on and off the properties.

The application was refused on a majority vote, with one councillor for and six against.

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page