Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 1st August 2010

Anti-terror laws used to net minor offenders

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 March 2009
Fareham Borough Council has used anti-terror laws more than 200 times to spy on people and catch them committing minor offences.
The authority came fourth highest for the number of times it has used the powers in a national poll.

The council admitted using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 240 times in the last five years to tackle anti-social behaviour and other
minor crime.

Across the country the powers have been used 10,000 times in the past five years, according to figures released to the Liberal Democrats under the Freedom of Information Act.

The party is demanding stricter rules on when the act can be used.

Julia Goldsworthy, Shadow Communities and Local Government Secretary, said: 'When RIPA was passed, only nine organisations, including the police and security services, were allowed to use it.

'Now a total of 795 bodies, including all 475 local authorities, can use powers that were originally designed to prevent terrorism.

'Unless RIPA is reformed it risks becoming a snoopers' charter. Surveillance powers should only be used to investigate serious crimes and must require a magistrate's warrant.'

Fareham council leader Sean Woodward said: 'Only senior managers can authorise the use of the laws.

'We have zero tolerance to benefit fraud, which accounts for the vast majority of times we have used it.

'I don't think anyone would say benefit fraud is not a serious crime.'

Gosport Borough Council revealed it had used the act, which was designed to tackle terror suspects and serious crime,nine times to catch dog foulers, flytippers, noisy neighbours - and to crackdown on the illegal sale of shell fish.

Portsmouth has used the act 22 times, while East Hampshire has used it 34 times.

Figures are not available for Havant, Hampshire and West Sussex.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 March 2009 12:33 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

toxteth o'grady,

26/03/2009 08:45:49
'Unless RIPA is reformed it risks becoming a snoopers' charter. Surveillance powers should only be used to investigate serious crimes and must require a magistrate's warrant.' ........ Why ??????

If they are breaking the law, then charge 'em !!!
2

SEJ016,

Fareham 26/03/2009 22:10:39
The basic premise of the story is is wrong. Prior to RIPA a council could involve itself in "investigation and surveillance" without any regulation at all.

RIPA (as the name suggests) regulated investigatory powers, so now they need authorisation to perform any surveillance. The powers were not "originally designed to prevent terrorism" as stated, but to regulate previously uncontrolled surveillance activities.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.