Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 6th September 2010

Fury as Royal Navy uses aircraft carrier to supply warship

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
09 December 2009
Royal Fleet Auxiliary workers who are fighting proposals to privatise the service have criticised the Royal Navy for using an aircraft carrier to refuel a warship.
Maritime unions said it was 'ominous' that HMS Ark Royal was used to supply the Portsmouth frigate HMS St Albans.

Normally the job is done by the RFA flotilla in its role as the navy's lifeline at sea.

But staff and unions fear it is a sign of things to come because of the £200m cuts to the defence budget called for in today's pre-budget report in Parliament.

As revealed by The News last month, shocked RFA staff were told in Portsmouth that the Treasury had pushed for cost savings that could mean the privatisation of the service.

A fleet auxiliary worker from Portsmouth, who does not want to be named, said: 'To have the navy showing how it can replenish ships without the RFA ahead of a major review is really insensitive. We are waiting to hear if we will be out of work and that seems like really bad timing.'

RMT spokesman Geoff Martin said: 'The display of a warship-to-warship replenishment is very ominous as the service faces this uncertainty.'

Briefings to RFA staff over the past month have confirmed that Treasury demands for a 10 per cent cut in the MoD budget have forced the possible shake-up.

Bob Crow, RMT general secretary, said: 'The government should be under no illusions. RMT will mobilise a political and public campaign on a massive scale to fight off any moves to privatise the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.

'There is no doubt there will be an angry backlash against any attempt to compromise national security by embarking on a cash-led sell-off of this essential lifeline to our naval crews all around the globe.'

A Royal Navy spokesman in Portsmouth said: 'The replenishment was purely an exercise and has no bearing on the review of the RFA, which aims to deliver value for money.'

>> Vote in our latest web poll.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 December 2009 1:03 PM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
2
1

Arnold Rimmer,

Portsmouth 09/12/2009 15:28:30
We'll soon see where the "value for money" is when the RFA replacements are private ships manned by immigrant and cheap labour and are needed to go into hostile waters or war zones - the costs in insurance liabilities alone will be astronomical! And can the loyalty of the crews be assured? I think not!
2

rocky 21,

gosport 09/12/2009 15:52:48
shame on the navy you have a service that is known world wide for its outstanding work for the navy and when they need supporting the navy shoots them in the back hope the next load of supplies they get is rotten
3

denis the m,

Portsmouth 09/12/2009 16:37:48
Why is a Defence Correspondant pushing this out as a news story. The navy has been doing warship to warship fueling for donkeys years going back to the war. It is always exercised as are all other events on a regular basis to ensure that when it is really needed it is not dangerous. Not a story this one.
I do agree however that we should retain the RFA who do a great job
4

Neil McCart,

Cheltenham 09/12/2009 16:58:47
The practice of large warships refuelling smaller vessels goes back much further than the Second World War. Many instances can be found of 19th century coal burning battleships refuelling smaller coal burners. The practice became even more common after oil fuel replaced coal, and by the 1920s both aircraft carriers and battleships/battlecruisers regularly exercised refuelling smaller ships at sea.

The argument as to whether the Royal Fleet Auxiliary Service should be "privatised" is a separate issue. I suspect that what may appear superficially to be financial savings may in the long term just prove to be an illusion. However, since when have politicians thought in the long term usually, whatever the colour of their rosette, they look ahead no further than the next General Election.
5

Dick B,

Fareham 09/12/2009 17:41:16
If an aircraft carrier refuels it's escorts it will soon be out of fuel itself. The RFA are normally in the background ready to refuel the refuellers and provide spares and food etc. I cannot see a navy being without suport ships unless it is not going abroard.
If the RFA goes private I cannot really see a problem as long as its ships stay British flagged and owned. The Falklands war proved that merchant crews would be loyal.
6

Mike B,

portsmouth 09/12/2009 18:45:18
It's not unusual for a capital ship to re fuel one of it's escorts.
7

MaryMungoandMidge,

Southampton 09/12/2009 19:55:12
This has been done so many times before, it is standard practice. I have served on HMS Ark Royal myself when the capital ship refuelled a Type 42 destroyer, it wasn't news then and shouldnt be made into a drama now. Civvys strike, sailors don't - there are many reasons why this evolution is exercised, as well as simply being practical if an RFA isn't in area at the time.
8

Jameshammond,

Pompey 09/12/2009 20:58:27
In reply to Civvys strike, sailors don't from marymungoandmidge. Maybe the Navy should stop paying Sailors extra money to go to sea, isn't that what sailors are ment to do? I'm a (as you put it) "civvy" i get paid the same no matter where i am, be it alongside in Pompey or down the Gulf. I wonder how much the Navy could save if it didn't pay it's sailors extra to go to sea? Do the RAF pay it's people extra to Fly?
9

MaryMungoandMidge,

Southampton 09/12/2009 21:57:20
We get paid extra
Civvy RFA workers work 6 months then get 3 months off.
10

Miu Dulfuc,

Gosport 10/12/2009 08:32:36
JamesHammond you really need to think before posting!! RAF crew who fly get flying pay! If I was in a civilian job that paid me the same wage for working in Portsmouth as it did if I worked in the Gulf I'd leave it!!!! Simples
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.