Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

HMS Invincible is dead in the water

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 June 2009
The government claims she is part of the fleet, ready to be called upon to defend the country if needed.
But today The News can reveal the truth about how HMS Invincible – supposedly in a state of 'extended readiness' – is in fact a warship far from ready for action.

The Ministry of Defence claims she is available for action until September 2010, when she will leave the fleet.

But a Freedom of Information request by The News reveals she is crewed by just four people as she languishes in Portsmouth's dockyard.

She has been raided for spares – her engines have been stripped out and her propellers have been seen lying on her deck.

And far from being ready for service, navy sources say it would take around 18 months to prepare Invincible for use – a period which would take her well past the date she is scheduled to end her days in the Royal Navy.

Her sorry state is a far cry from the description of her on the Royal Navy's website which claims she can be counted among the navy's finest.

The description refers to her decommissioning in 2005 by saying: 'This process is often mistaken for being withdrawn from service but we are still very much 'part of the fleet'.

'In fact Invincible will remain available to the navy until 2010.

'This forms part of a long-term plan to assist with the introduction of the new CVF Aircraft Carriers, HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince Of Wales.'

Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock, who sits on the Commons defence committee, said: 'Saying HMS Invincible is part of the fleet and available to the navy is the same as saying the Marie Celeste had a full ship's company in healthy mood.

'All of our ships bar submarines are visible to anyone and it doesn't take a genius to work out that Invincible isn't going anywhere.

'The navy should be more open, and not claiming capabilities we don't have.'

Former naval officer and editor of Warship World, Mike Critchley, said: 'As far as I'm aware she doesn't even have her anchors, which tells you how likely the chances of her going to sea are.

'She has been stripped of most valuable items for the other carriers, which makes sense, but that means the only time she is going to sea is when she leaves for the breaker's yard.'

Despite The News's findings, the Royal Navy insisted the carrier was still available to the fleet.

A navy spokesman said: 'It is not Royal Navy policy to discuss the readiness state of any warship for operational reasons.

'The position is that HMS Invincible remains within the Royal Navy fleet and remains available until the time that she leaves service.

'Four navy personnel remain on the scheme of complement of HMS Invincible and act as a full-time caretaking unit.'


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2009 9:37 PM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Lewis1604,

Portchester 27/06/2009 17:53:12
Do not be to quick to "write off" this old girl just yet,
she maybe in a bit of a bad state at the moment, if needed the MOD will get her up and running again should the need for her to go to war present itself.

When Ark Royal was in 'extended readiness' four years ago, she too sat in the same place as invincible,and was just a bad. They said above it would take 18 months to get her ready, but this i'm guessing is based on now,in peace time, in the time of war it would be different.

it is a shame a this fantastic ship is rotting away,
but while the old girl's hull is still in the water, she's still waiting incase she is neeeded.

2

Arnold Rimmer,

Portsmouth 27/06/2009 19:22:38
Lewis 1604 - I can't say too much but INVINCIBLE will NEVER go to sea again even if we declared war on someone tomorrow - the amount of replacement parts (especially crucial parts) would be nigh on impossible to source unless newly manufactured and that ain't gonna happen! Yet again we have a Government that is ignorant of this Maritime Nation's need for a strong Royal Navy (and that applies to the Tory Government's of the past as well - remember Thatcher and Nott anyone?).
3

1986nufc,

Portchester 30/06/2009 12:57:57
Lewis, Invince' is written off! There will be no chance of repeating the feats that were pulled by off by Dockies in 1982 during the Falklands by getting ships converted/built/armed/re-commisioned from scrap or scratch.

I am inclined to agree with Arnold. It is history repeating itself all over again. Sooner or later something will happen where we realise we need a large and strong Royal Navy to defend our interests. We can't even pull back Fearless or Intrepid from reserve!

For the inevitable campaign with Iran we will be sending Invincible(powered by oars) escorted by Warrior and Victory and a few Leanders brought back from the Ethiopian navy.
4

LoriEtna,

Barrow-in-Furness 11/08/2009 16:21:22
I am not enjoying reading this article to learn that HMS Invincible is not being looked after and is far from a state of readiness. We are currently running a campaign to bring her home back to Barrow for a resting place, you can visit our website on www.bringinvinciblehome.co.uk I find it quite shocking. We are hoping to bring this fine ship home so that she can be appreciated for her time spent with the Royal Navy. I really hope that the MOD consider this move as they no longer require her and for once, it would not hurt them to let the ship go and with dignity too.
5

hatpete,

portsmouth 20/08/2009 17:28:34
the invincible like all naval ships has a great affection for the people of portsmouth,her 1st call of duty straight into the falklands war,so how about her future as a musuem peice with all photos and other falklands war archives to display as a tribute to all those who served and gave so much.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.