Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Nudists dismayed as road given go-ahead

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
12 June 2009
A CONTROVERSIAL development overlooking a nudist beach is one step closer after a U-turn by city leaders.
Portsmouth City Council has agreed that a stretch of land leading to the site near Fort Cumberland, Eastney, can be used as a road.
It comes after city lawyers warned the council that it could face a costly legal battle unless it gave permission to
change the use of the land.
Cllr Mike Hancock, in charge of planning, regeneration and economic development, said: 'I resent the fact that we are being put in this position, but I do not think it will be of benefit to the taxpayer to risk tens of thousands of pounds of their money.
'I don't think we can afford to take that chance when all the advice says the courts will be against us.
'But one thing I cannot stand is someone putting a gun to my head and saying "I'll take you to court if you don't do this".'
At a cabinet meeting this week councillors grudgingly reversed their previous decision to block the road plan and agreed the land could be transferred from the planning department to the highways department.
Developer QinetiQ needs to provide the access road to fulfil conditions of its outline planning permission.
It means the firm can press on with a full planning application for 131 flats overlooking the beach at Fort Cumberland.
As well as finalising details of the access road, an environmental study is under way to see if the development would jeopardise a rare bird, the Dartford warbler.
Cllr Leo Madden said: 'This matter will go before the planning committee and it is best if these issues, the environmental impact and other issues, are taken up at that stage.'
Cabinet members Jason Fazackarley and John Ireland voted against allowing QinetiQ to use the land as a road.
Cllr Fazackarley said: 'I don't agree with the way QinetiQ have conducted their business and I don't want to be bullied by them on this issue.'




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 June 2009 10:36 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

1986nufc,

12/06/2009 12:04:58
If we were talking about Baywatch standard nudists then I too would be up in arms about this road. However, this is Pompey and therefore it is actually more akin to the scene of a Sealion berthing colony.

Therefore I say for the love og God build the road!
2

this-isnt-news,

12/06/2009 12:58:52
Finally common sense prevails in the face of looney NIMBYS and political wrangling and this development can proceed. The council has a lot to answer for in the way they have dealt with this.
3

no 6,

Fareham 12/06/2009 13:32:31
Quote.

It means the firm can press on with a full planning application for 131 flats overlooking the beach at Fort Cumberland.

With the council's seeming intention to build on every spare inch of the ISLAND was this in any doubt
4

Diamond Smiles,

12/06/2009 14:32:18
Oh great! Yet more open land being built upon. What with the cycle lane on the seafront being binned this council sure does like a U Turn!
5

Sun Seeker,

Portsmouth 12/06/2009 15:06:09
Not exactly open space given that it is a military site surrounded by concrete & razor wire!! Although I dont want to see large numbers of flats here and I hope the Council block this development at Cttee stage in the near future....

Whats wrong with landscaping it over? We need more open space.
6

no 6,

Fareham 12/06/2009 16:26:56
We need more open space, I don't think so.

What we need is more houses and flats bringing in community charge, and get rid of this free parking round the town, more parking meters binging in few quid, thats what we need, and paying toilets, not these free ones that are hidden about.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.