Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 1st August 2010

Scenic lift at the Spinnaker could finally be on the move

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 February 2010
ENGINEERS believe they can finally fix the Spinnaker Tower's external glass lift.
The revelation comes 1,587 days after the opening of the tower in October 2005, which saw the panoramic lift get stuck during the opening ceremony.

For almost five years the lift, designed to provide spectacular views to visitors as it rose to the top of the attraction, has stayed shut.
A series of baffled experts has tried to come up with a solution to make it reliable enough to satisfy tower operators Heritage.

Now, following a series of Freedom of Information requests submitted by The News, Portsmouth City Council has said engineers have discovered the problem – and worked out a solution.

But there is still no firm plan in place for when the work will be carried out, or who will pay for it.

The council says it is locked in ongoing discussions with tower builders Carillion, formerly Mowlem, and operators Heritage in a bid to work out who should foot the bill, which could run into millions.
In the meantime they are keeping tight-lipped about the time frame and the costs.

Lib Dem council leader Gerald Vernon-Jackson said: 'My understanding of the problem is that it has been the reliability – the builders say it is OK and reliable enough, but the operators say it is not.

'We need to make sure everybody agrees that this technical solution is going to make the lift better and more reliable.'

A specialist lift consultant came up with the plan to fix the lift, which will see the control system replaced.

Currently, the lift communicates with the landing stations at either end through a rail which carries power to the car. If the car loses contact with the rail for any reason, such as wind, the lift stops.

A microprocessor system will now be installed, so if the lift loses communication it will still remember which direction it is heading and complete its journey, instead of getting stuck half way up the tower.
Parts of the lift installed by Italian manufacturers Maspero will also be replaced with UK parts to make maintenance easier.

Mike Arthur, deputy head of asset management for the council, said: 'The lift will always break down – all lifts do. But these are things that should considerably improve reliability.'

Cllr Simon Bosher, Conservative spokesman for planning, regeneration and economic development, said: 'The problem is we are five years down the line from the time people were very publicly stuck in the lift, and I think people have lost confidence in it altogether.

'It has been patched up time and time again. I think it has lost credibility.

'Having said that I really hope this isn't another false dawn and something can be done.

'I have been up in the lift and it is fabulous.'

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 February 2010 10:19 PM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Ray Martin,

Waterlooville 20/02/2010 11:15:36
Where do The News reporters get their figures from?

Who told Alex Forsyth that the costs to repair the lift "could run into millions"?

Perhaps it was dreamt up in his bath or was it one of those mysterious 'sources' that The News is keen to quote? The Pompey FC reports in The News are littered with 'sources'.

Let's have the name of this 'source' brought into the public domain.

Meanwhile as 'millions' has been used in the report perhaps we can have a competition to see who can guess the final repair figure. I'll start the ball rolling with £300 million pounds. Silly isn't it? But no sillier than quoting 'millions'.
2

Graham Wheatley,

Southsea 20/02/2010 14:15:00
If the design of, or the parts used in, the lift were below standard then the supplier - Maspero - should foot the bill.

If the lift was supplied according to a specification that they (Maspero) received, then perhaps the client should bear some of the cost for not ordering what was appropriate. However one would hope that this specification was arrived at after consulting the supplier, and if that advice was poor, then again, the supplier should foot the bill.

The Council Tax payers of this city have already stumped up over £14,000,000 for this project when originally, it was not going to cost a single penny over and above the Lottery funding of £16,000,000. At a profit to the council of c.£500,000 p.a. [PCC's own figures...] it will still be another 23 years before we see a return on our investment.

I do hope that this will not be yet another addition to the costs that must be borne by the long-suffering Council Tax payer. Time perhaps for Mr. Lawther to take another, closer, look at the contract??
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.