Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

Demolition begins on Harry Redknapp owned Southsea eyesore

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
22 May 2009
Work has begun to demolish a former nightclub now owned by ex-Pompey boss Harry Redknapp.
Scaffolding has been put up around the 80-year-old Savoy Buildings on Southsea seafront – an entertainment venue for decades and most recently home to the Time and Envy and Joanna's nightclubs.

The decaying facades of the buildings have been branded an eyesore since the clubs closed – but workers have now begun the work of knocking down the structure.

Work will then get under way on building 92 flats in its place, transforming the shape of Southsea seafront to the relief of residents who complained bitterly about the state of the old Savoy, bought by Mr Redknapp in 2007.

Permission to redevelop the site was granted in July that year but when the property market crashed many feared the site would remain in its unappealing state.

Ward councillor Terry Hall, Lib Dem, said: 'People constantly raised it.

'There are one or two privately-owned derelict buildings along the seafront and the council gets the blame for that, but we're spending hundreds of thousands on shelters and repainting and the gardens.

'You can have a mouth full of beautiful teeth, but if there's one tooth missing no-one sees the others – and that's what's happening with the seafront.'

Tory ward councillor Luke Stubbs added: 'It's in the interests of the wider area to get this work done. I've had dozens of letters and notes about the buildings, more than any other issue. It's something people care about especially because it spoils the seafront so much.'

The demolition is being carried out by Portsmouth Demolition Services, based in Victory Business Centre, Fratton.

Managing director Arthur Meakin, 59, said: 'It's the end of an era isn't it? The building's been there since before the 1950s.

'In the 40s and 50s it was a busy place, from looking at photos. Going back then it was when Britain's coasts were holiday resorts.

'Obviously today it's not the same.'


10-WEEK PROJECT

The site of the Savoy Buildings was protected from development until the early 20th century, because it stood in front of a row of coastguard cottages which needed a clear line of sight to the sea.

The Savoy Buildings were built in 1929 as a ballroom and in the 1970s it became the nightclub Nero's, then Fifth Avenue, and latterly Time and Envy.

The development will see the site razed and rebuilt as 92 flats. Savoy Court, the adjoining building on its eastern flank, is to be kept intact and converted to flats.

Demolition involves around eight men, and it is expected to take around 10 weeks to clear the site.

>> Vote in our latest web poll.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 May 2009 7:02 AM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
2
1

TheFixer,

portsmouth 22/05/2009 10:02:48
im not going to jump on the "too many flats being built" band wagon but southsea sea front is dying if not dead now !! i remember years ago it was busy with places to go and now its a ghost town..you pop along to bournmouth or brighton and look at their sea front !!i think portsmouth council should stop putting up flats down there and push towards more attracting places of interest !! just a thought ...
2

,

22/05/2009 10:53:25
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

oz76,

22/05/2009 12:19:23
cant harry stay away from pompey tellhim to *iss of*
4

toxteth o'grady,

22/05/2009 12:31:18
What is there actually in Southsea worth driving down there for ?

A stoney beach with just about (?) safe water to swim in.
2 disgraceful piers.
A common full of dog sh**
& lots of nice flats to look at.

hmmm I'll think I will bypass Southsea & head to Bournemouth
5

Graham Wheatley,

Southsea 22/05/2009 12:53:17
I agree. The site should have been either a hotel or conference centre. Something to cater for the transient population, be they conference delegates or tourists.

Some of the 92 flats will be Band-A and some Band-B Council Tax - say, an average of around £1000 each per year?

That's £92,000 in Council Tax Receipts (and increasing every year thereafter).

PCC weren't going to refuse planning permission for flats, were they?

6

Cllr Luke Stubbs,

Southsea 22/05/2009 13:43:58
Just to answer Graham's point (6), the council did refuse planning permission only to be overturned by the inspectorate. In my opinion, they were wrong to refuse it - they should have deferred the scheme and asked for design changes, which they may well have got.
7

Mike B,

portsmouth 22/05/2009 13:47:50
The council needs to invest some serous money in Southsea.
We need a few bars,cafes and thing for people to do.
Southsea is turning into a nursing home,and the area will suffer.
8

Scourge,

Portsmouth 22/05/2009 15:44:58
Don't worry all of you. Councillor Mike Hancock has ordered another public consultaion on the seafront, as reported in this Newspaper earlier in the week. Just as he did 11 years ago. Nothing came of the first one and I suspoect, nothing will come of this one either. 'You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people, all of the time!'

By the way, when are you going to publish your MP's expenses Hancock?'
9

Kevin George,

Winterville 22/05/2009 17:56:39
That was the stupidity of following the Police request to move all the night clubs into one place in Guildhall Walk.. Ok so it's easier to police, but then you have a much bigger concentration of trouble instead of smaller areas spread across the City.
I enjoyed my younger years flitting from club to club drinking / dancing..
Even some of the hotels used to have 'mini-clubs' below ground.. I remember seeing Mike Reid in Soutshea in one such place some 30 years ago...
10

digicom,

Portsmouth 22/05/2009 21:34:58
Graham Wheatley has hit the nail on the head. Planning in this City has nothing to do with what is right and good for the city, it is all to do with the vested interest of the City Council and Councillors and the ruling political party, especially this one the LibDems, who succour donations for planning permissions. You don't have a chance with a planning application unless it maximises council tax returns, so conference centre versus 92 flats is a non starter on these criteria. That is why we have been seeing a decline in suucessful applications that provide economic regeneration, conference centres etc and cramming in of flats that maximise profit for the developer and council tax returns.
After all Councillors self awarded 13.9% pay rise and Council Officers 9% have to be funded.
To hell with what's good for the city.
SNOUTS IN THE TROUGH CONTINUED.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.