Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Biscoes
Sponsored by
Official Portsmouth Football Club Partner
www.biscoes-law.co.uk - 0845 4566 944
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Harry's seafront site plans under attack



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 October 2008
HARRY Redknapp has come under fire for his plan to knock down buildings on Southsea seafront.
The Pompey FC boss has put in a planning application to demolish the Savoy Buildings opposite South Parade Pier, which he owns after taking control of Pierfront Developments last August.

It has long been believed that Mr Redknapp had ties to the development, which used to house the Time and Envy nightclubs, but this has not been confirmed until now.

Mr Redknapp has already got permission – granted on appeal last year – to demolish the Savoy Buildings and to build 92 flats in its place.

Local property experts put the sale value of such a development as being between £13m and £18m, depending on the exact nature of the flats, but the property market is in crisis.

The current planning permission dictates that Mr Redknapp must have plans in place for a new building as soon as demolition is complete, so the manager has come forward with a fresh plan.

The Pompey boss's new application simply seeks to demolish the existing structure – with no mention of any new building.

This has drawn criticism from local councillors.

Tory ward councillor Luke Stubbs said: 'The housing market is in recession, and that could last for years. If he gets permission to knock it down, the site could stand empty for two, three, four years.

'If it goes through it will create an eyesore in one of the most prominent parts of the city. I don't care who the applicant is, this can't be allowed to happen.'

Mr Redknapp said a new structure for the site was being designed but demolition was a priority. He said: 'It's already been sitting there empty for ages, it's been an eyesore for years and years. We've got squatters going in there at the moment, it's a nightmare – we're trying to push on as quickly as possible to put some nice apartments there.

'It needs to be redeveloped. Right now it's rotting, it looks disgusting.'

A spokesman for Pierfront Developments insisted a new building was planned but added it had to be 'commercially viable'.

But property expert Roger Sherliker, from Hampshire agency Hughes Ellard, said it might be years before the market picked up.

'Clearly developing flats right now is not a great idea because of the state of the market. It would be a bit of an embarrassment for the city to have a big, prestige site like that sitting empty, but from a practical security standpoint you can see why.'

adam.kula@thenews.co.uk

The full article contains 434 words and appears in The News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 October 2008 7:34 PM
  • Source: The News
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
2
1

PompeyUAE,

Afghanistan 11/10/2008 12:36:48
Please let him knock it down, those buildings have been an eye sore for years....it must be teaming with vermin! Clear it put up, fence off with hoarding with nice artwork...maybe an artists impression of what is coming! painted using the whole block seen it done in Europe looks great...and would be so much better than what is there today, it might even embrass the pier owners to tidy there act up..as at the moment it is difficult to decide which is worse, PUP!
2

Hudo,

Portsmouth 11/10/2008 12:45:33
Knock it down and make it a very large car park and the people will not have to park on OUR cpommon!
3

,

11/10/2008 13:53:15
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

Mike B,

portsmouth 11/10/2008 16:54:20
Knock it down, lets have something better than just flats.
5

rick coburn,

emsworth 11/10/2008 20:41:36
pehaps the new stadium is 4 there on stilts-like the other 1 in the sea
6

Scott McGarveys Perm,

Portsmouth 11/10/2008 22:20:08
Anyone that has walked past these building can see what a state they are in and really let the area down.
It's about time they were taken down.

Good to see Harry getting involved in more than just football in Pompey.

Play Up Pompey.
7

Posh End of Hampshire,

Southampton 11/10/2008 22:47:46
I've heard that due to the credit crunch Pompey will not be moving to a larger stadium anywhere for the next 15 years at least. Rumour is they are going to buy a subbutteo stadium so they can increase their capicity?
8

Scott McGarveys Perm,

Portsmouth 11/10/2008 23:43:20
Or we could take over sain*s flat pack ground since you only manage to get 14k in the fizzy pop league, while we take on AC Milan in the UEFA cup... Nuff said you muppet :o)

9

Michael S.,

12/10/2008 06:54:25
Maybe the flats are for the players?,or the new stadium.When the scums go down to leaugue 1 then 2 the crowds will be gone,hey when the go down to the blue square league they will need to pay for their uhhhh....whatever they play in.
10

Pompey Pieman,

12/10/2008 08:31:46
Maybe the flats are for the players?,or the new stadium.When the scums go down to leaugue 1 then 2 the crowds will be gone,hey when the go down to the blue square league they will need to pay for their uhhhh....whatever they play in

Nice to see your education wasn't wasted!
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

News


Entertainment


Pompey


Other sport


Business


Elections


Awards


Community


Campaigns


Information


Advertising


We Can Do It




Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.