Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

13-year-olds to be offered morning-after pills

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 February 2007
SCHOOLGIRLS as young as 13 will be offered the 'morning-after pill' free in a bid to cut teenage pregnancies.

In a controversial move, 11 Portsmouth pharmacies are to hand out the pills to youngsters who fear they may be pregnant.

Girls won't need parental consent to get hold of the pill but will need identification to prove their age.

Church leaders have hit out at the plans but health chiefs insist the move is necessary to slash the number of teenage pregnancies in the city.

Pregnancies among 15 to 17-year-olds in Portsmouth are more than 26 per cent above the national average. Sixteen to 17-year-olds account for 45 per cent of all teenage conceptions.

Portsmouth Primary Care Trust director of public health Paul Edmondson-Jones said: 'At the moment you can buy emergency contraception over the counter in Portsmouth for about £25, but that amount is a huge barrier.

'We want to avoid unwanted pregnancy. It is not about stopping pregnancy among people aged 18 and 19 who choose to have a baby in a relationship. We just need to make sure it's a genuine, intended pregnancy.'

Teenage pregnancies are also a problem in Havant and Gosport where the rate is above the national average.

The 'morning-after pill' is already available free for girls and women aged between 13 and 24 in Fareham, Gosport and East Hampshire.

Health chiefs say pharmacists will ask a series of questions to check whether the girls understand the pros and cons.

They must also check their medical health, suggest the child discusses it with their parents and can refer them to a GP or family planning clinic.

Graham Davis, a consultant at the sexual health clinic at St Mary's Hospital, Milton, Portsmouth, said: 'All participating pharmacists will have to be trained before being able to hand out the drug.

'I think it will make the contraceptive more accessible. Clinics have set opening hours and young people may not feel comfortable going to their doctor.

'Perhaps this way young people will be able to access emergency contraception sooner.'

However, Canon David Hopgood, Dean of St John's RC Cathedral, in Edinburgh Road, Portsmouth, blasted the plan.

He said: 'I have grave concerns. I can understand the dilemma young people can get themselves into but giving the morning-after pill out so freely isn't going to solve the problem.

'They need to be looking at family life, the importance of marriage and good stable homes where children are brought up with stronger values.'

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 February 2007 12:28 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Portsmouth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Reginald Pinhorne,

Rowlands Castle 28/02/2007 11:39:16
come on dont you know thats its against the law for females to have sex under the age of 16.so why do the police turne a blind eye to this.if thats the case then do away with equal rights.
2

Hazel Walton,

Portsmouth 28/02/2007 15:17:01
I think it's a good idea. Teenage girls often end up in this situation by mistake why should they not be allowed to make a decision about their lives? In the long run it will save council's money in supporting teenage mums, providing houses and care. I don't think that this will increase the number of young girls having under age sex I think it will just act as a protector for them if they end up in this situation by mistake.
3

Paul Tully,

London 01/03/2007 11:25:28
Those promoting this scheme like Paul Edmondson-Jones and Graham Davis are misleading the public if they suggest that promoting the Morning After Pill will cut pregnancy rates. The medical journal 'Obstetrics and Gynecology' published a review in January which looked at 37 studies around the world on the impact of the MAP. Not one of the 37 studes found that it reduced abortion or pregnancy rates. The reviewers were not church leaders or pro-life campaigners, but included James Trussel one of the leading supporters of the MAP in the US.
4

Paul Tully,

London 01/03/2007 11:35:19
Correction - the review I referred to looked at 23 studies, not 37. Apologies for the error.
5

Gerry Dorrian,

Cambridge 06/04/2007 00:33:11
I doubt very much if 13-15 year old girls are going to understand the enormity of a decision like this during a short interview. How about better sex education, including the concept that it's ok to say no? The DoH is not going to get anywhere with its campaign to delay early sex if the consequences of early sex can be dealt with during a visit to the chemist.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.