REGIONAL: Row over noisy ‘foreign’ cockerel in Hampshire village ends up in court

Retired businessman Neil Dymott, who was given a restraining order despite being acquitted of a campaign of harassment against his neighbours Helen Richardson and Paula Holland, in a dispute over a noisy 'foreign' cockerel Picture: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire
Retired businessman Neil Dymott, who was given a restraining order despite being acquitted of a campaign of harassment against his neighbours Helen Richardson and Paula Holland, in a dispute over a noisy 'foreign' cockerel Picture: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire

Top volunteers recognised at police boss’s awards ceremony

0
Have your say

A retired businessman has been given a restraining order despite being acquitted of a campaign of harassment against his neighbours in a dispute over a noisy ‘foreign’ cockerel.

Neil Dymott was found not guilty of two charges of harassment following a two-day trial at Southampton Magistrates’ Court.

Helen Richardson and Paula Holland, left, leaving Southampton Magistrates' Court Picture: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire

Helen Richardson and Paula Holland, left, leaving Southampton Magistrates' Court Picture: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire

The court heard allegations that the 56-year-old threatened to cut the cockerel’s head off and shouted homophobic abuse at Helen Richardson and Paula Holland who lived next to his home in Marchwood.

He was also accused of playing music by Queen at a loud volume as well as the song When A Man Loves A Woman repeatedly for an hour-and-a-half.

Mr Dymott said he only played loud music on two occasions and said he did not swear at the complainants or insult their sexuality, but did admit calling Ms Richardson ‘a psycho’.

Colin Wyatt, chairman of the bench, said: ‘Whilst we find some of the actions and behaviour were inappropriate we do not feel this constitutes the offence of harassment.’

Referring to the music, he added: “We agree the course of action was childish, immature and petulant.”

The magistrates imposed a restraining order on Mr Dymott prohibiting him from contacting the complainants directly or indirectly for two years.

He said: “You have to live as neighbours, you need to behave and stop being stupid or petulant.

‘Can you get on as neighbours, life is too short.’

The defendant told the trial that he had complained to police himself about the noise created by his neighbours’ cockerel and hens and blamed the volume on the type of chicken.

He said he had made audio and video recordings to gather evidence against his neighbours.

Mr Dymott said: ‘I think it’s irresponsible and not a nice thing to do, to have cockerels crowing at that level, they were crowing all day.

‘Those cockerels go off as much as 60 to 70 times an hour. This is not a British bird, these are birds going all the time.

‘When they started crowing they do not just crown once, they crow, crow, crow.’

The retired replacement window firm boss added: ‘It’s the type of chicken, an ordinary chicken that lays eggs do not make screaming noises, it’s the type of chickens, these aren’t ordinary little reds, these are colourful, these are Rhode Island reds, these are Plymouth Rocks, these are American beds.’

He continued: ‘If these had been a British cockerel and going off at dawn and dusk we wouldn’t be here.’

The court has heard Ms Richardson and Ms Holland had arranged for the cockerel to be killed in August 2015 but the dispute still continued afterwards when Mr Dymott alleged they were hiding a cockerel from him.

The trial also heard that Mr Dymott and Ms Richardson clashed in her front garden which she said caused her an injury to her arm while the defendant said he suffered a cut lip.

Mr Dymott also denied he was angry because the noise devalued his property or telling them: ‘Don’t mess with a multi-millionaire. I am going to take you for £50,000, I have a barrister.’

Speaking outside court, Ms Richardson, said: ‘We are pleased that we have a restraining order in place against him so there shouldn’t be any more instances.’

She added that they still kept chickens, but did not rule out have another cockerel in the future.

She said: ‘We may have in the future if one of our chicks is a cockerel, we may keep him. From our point of view, it’s been ruled as not a statutory noise nuisance on at least three occasions.’

She added that the hen which Mr Dymott claimed was an American breed was actually a gold-pencilled fayoumi hen which originates in Ancient Egypt.

Ms Holland added: ‘I feel it’s really quite sad that we live in such a beautiful rural area and people complain about countryside noises like a cockerel.’