Public would back more armed forces spending

The fragment from the Union Jack believed to have flown on board HMS Victory at the Battle of Trafalgar. Credit: Sotheby's

Flag from HMS Victory and Lord Nelson’s love letters up for sale at London auction

  • Survey finds 53 per cent of people would like to see the armed forces made stronger
  • But vast majority of people do not understand how the military benefits the economy
0
Have your say

Public opinion supports an increase in defence spending, according to a new report.

Management consultancy firm PwC commissioned a report on the perception of the role of the armed forces.

The public takes the view that the military’s strength should be increased and that the armed forces’ roles at home and abroad are very important. This raises questions about how the actual readiness of the forces squares with how ready the public wants them to be.

Roland Sonnenberg

It found the public is increasingly concerned by ‘modern threats’ such as terrorism and cyber attacks.

The report, Forces for change: the public’s view of defence, was based on a survey of 2,000 people and also found that a majority of people (53 per cent) would like to see the UK’s military strength increase in the next 20 years.

Of those who responded, 16 per cent say they would like it to decrease and 21 per cent would like it to stay the same.

A further 58 per cent of respondents indicate a preference for an armed forces with a large military budget, well trained medium size forces, with naval and air capacity and modern technology.

Survey respondents perceive the armed forces defending the UK from threats abroad, intervening in situations overseas where UK security or citizens are directly threatened, and managing disasters at home and abroad, as very important roles.

Yet the research also finds evidence that the public perceive the forces to be under-equipped, raising the issue of whether there will be the capability and capacity to deliver such a broad range of roles.

Roland Sonnenberg, partner at PwC, said:’The public takes the view that the military’s strength should be increased and that the armed forces’ roles at home and abroad are very important.

‘This raises questions about how the actual readiness of the forces squares with how ready the public wants them to be.

‘Are the forces capable of supporting both military and non-military roles in the future?’

The report also highlights the gap between the reality and perception of the contribution that the armed forces make to the wider economy.

When asked whether maintaining the armed forces has a positive or negative impact on the UK economy, 16 per cent of respondents answered ‘don’t know’, while 29 per cent think the military had no net effect on the economy.

Of those who did express an opinion one way or another, the results are broadly favourable for the forces: 37 per cent think that they strengthen the UK economy, with less than half that number (17 per cent) thinking they weaken it.

Roland Sonnenberg, partner at PwC, added: ‘While public support for the forces remains very high overall, this does not appear to be driven by their perceived economic contribution.

‘While more rigorous official data collection would help, more could be done across the defence sector to analyse and communicate the positive socio-economic benefits of their activity.

‘Public awareness could be increased around the contribution defence plays in supporting the economy, training and skilling younger people and creating jobs directly and indirectly in both the British defence supply chain and across the wider economy.

‘Using social media and other digital channels would be effective ways of reaching society generally and particularly the 18-34 year old demographic.

‘Each of the armed services are a multi-billion enterprise in their own right and need to help the public understand better the clear economic value that they generate.

‘The forces should consider how best to communicate with and engage the public to improve understanding, explaining the value and benefits they bring, around the breadth of their roles including their peacekeeping and disaster management responsibilities – areas that the public recognise as being very important.’

The report also found that the armed forces top the list of the UK’s most trusted institutions with 69 per cent of people rating them as either trustworthy or very trustworthy. Only 8 per cent of respondents rated them as untrustworthy. The NHS was second most highly rated, viewed as trustworthy or very trustworthy by 68 per cent of respondents.

Mr Sonnenberg said: ‘These findings have interesting implications in terms of who the public listens to in the debate on future defence needs. The generational differences we have identified may have repercussions for talent management. If 18-34 year olds do not value the forces or understand their purpose to the same degree as older demographics, this may impact on the ability of the defence sector to attract and retain top talent. The forces need to actively engage with young people, as a broader peer group.’