'Evil' Fareham woman beater who repeatedly stamped on partner and attacked neighbour is jailed

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
A ‘HORRIBLE and evil’ violent boyfriend who repeatedly stamped on his partner and then kicked her has been jailed.

Jealous woman beater Christopher Sainsbury, 34, turned ‘violent and aggressive’ after demanding to see his partner’s phone before beating her with a ‘shod foot’, a court heard.

The menace then went on the rampage and attacked a neighbour who tried to help the victim.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Read More
Scale of violence against women revealed as new figures show seven rapes reporte...
Jailed: Christopher Sainsbury. Pic Hampshire policeJailed: Christopher Sainsbury. Pic Hampshire police
Jailed: Christopher Sainsbury. Pic Hampshire police

The disturbing incident, which took place on June 27 last year at around 11pm in Sarisbury Green, left the woman branding Sainsbury ‘evil’ for his ‘vicious’ actions that took place in front of their young son who was left in tears.

Prosecutor Matthew Lawson told Portsmouth Crown Court Sainsbury, of Sissinghurst Road, Fareham, lost control having drunk about 10 alcoholic drinks.

He said: ‘(Sainsbury) demanded to see her phone before the victim went to the kitchen. He became more abusive and aggressive and took her phone and pushed her causing her to hit her head on the radiator before she landed on her back.

‘She shouted at him to leave but he stamped on her repeatedly. The defendant also admitted kicking her in the backside.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The desperate woman rang her neighbours for help with a man responding before the defendant stormed up to him.

‘(Sainsbury) grabbed him around the throat and said: “You're going to get a slap and your missus is going to get a slap too”,’ Mr Lawson said.

‘The defendant grabbed the man forcefully round the neck leaving him with red marks.’

Police were told by the female victim she had been stamped on at least five times - which Sainsbury rejected.

‘He denied it and argued it was self-defence,’ Mr Lawson added.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad