Katie Price avoids prison after breaching Michelle Penticost restraining order by sending her ‘angry and inflammatory’ message

KATIE Price has avoided jail after sending an ‘angry and inflammatory’ message to her ex-husband’s partner in breach of a restraining order.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The ex-glamour model was banned from contacting Kieran Hayler’s partner Michelle Penticost.

Ms Price sent Ms Penticost a message on January 21, calling her a ‘gutter slag’ and other inflammatory insults.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Read More
Judge warns Katie Price is 'in grave danger of going to prison' as she opts for ...
Katie Price leaving Lewes Crown Court, East Sussex, where she was sentenced to an 18-month community order with 150 hours of community service with an additional 20 hours for breach of a suspended sentence for driving matters. She was also ordered to pay £1,500 court costs, for breaching a restraining order. Picture: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire.Katie Price leaving Lewes Crown Court, East Sussex, where she was sentenced to an 18-month community order with 150 hours of community service with an additional 20 hours for breach of a suspended sentence for driving matters. She was also ordered to pay £1,500 court costs, for breaching a restraining order. Picture: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire.
Katie Price leaving Lewes Crown Court, East Sussex, where she was sentenced to an 18-month community order with 150 hours of community service with an additional 20 hours for breach of a suspended sentence for driving matters. She was also ordered to pay £1,500 court costs, for breaching a restraining order. Picture: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire.

She had pleaded guilty to breaching the restraining order and was sentenced to an 18-month community order, with 150 hours of community service and an additional 20 hours for breach of a suspended sentence for driving matters.

Ms Price was ordered to pay £1,500 in court costs.

Judge Stephen Mooney told Price: ‘In my judgement, this offence was committed out of anger.

‘The words you used were highly offensive and inflammatory so the breach cannot be considered minor.

Katie Price leaving Lewes Crown Court, East Sussex. Picture: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire.Katie Price leaving Lewes Crown Court, East Sussex. Picture: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire.
Katie Price leaving Lewes Crown Court, East Sussex. Picture: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire.

‘In my judgement, balancing the aggravating and mitigating and aggravating factors, the appropriate sentence is a medium level community order.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Price was banned from contacting Ms Penticost directly or indirectly under the terms of a five-year restraining order, imposed at Horsham Magistrates’ Court on June 3, 2019.

She was also fined £415 for hurling a foul-mouthed ‘tirade of abuse’ at her during a row in a school playground.

Her message, with inflammatory insults removed, read: ‘Tell your...girlfriend not to start on me.

‘She has a restraining order so shouldn’t try antagonise me as she is in breach and I’m sure she doesn’t want people knowing that she was having an affair with you behind my back. That gutter slag.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The court heard the offence was committed due to Price’s use of the words ‘tell your’, which was an indirect attempt to communicate with Penticost.

In a victim impact statement read to the court, Ms Penticost said the breach had a ‘devastating effect’ on her mental wellbeing.

She said: ‘The impact of what Katie has done is very upsetting, I feel threatened and intimidated.

‘I feel demoralised and not wanting to go out. The language used made me feel scared. I felt it was an attack on me.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

‘The consequences are I feel she will attack me. I felt by having a restraining order it would make me feel safe but by someone breaching it it has made me feel very vulnerable.’

Nicholas Hamblin, representing Price, said that his client had pleaded guilty to the breach but she had been under a ‘misunderstanding’ that the restraining order ‘worked both ways’.

He said there was an element of ‘provocation’ and she had been ‘over-reacting as she felt she was being criticised’.

He added: ‘She has shown signs of remorse, she accepts an indirect breach.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Mr Hamblin said that Miss Price had sought help for her emotional problems at the Priory Clinic.

He said she suffered from a ‘depressive disorder and anxiety’ and added: ‘Miss Price is learning to cope with her emotional problems and to not react in the way she has in this case.’

He continued: ‘She has two different personalities, the public one and the vulnerable one of being in the public eye, every day in the public eye no matter what she does.

‘It’s perhaps a case of building someone up only to knock them down.’

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He added that ‘there was a lot of good to be said’ for Price and she was considered in a probation report to be of ‘low risk of re-offending’.

Mr Hamblin said the offence was a ‘minor breach’ of the restraining order because it was an ‘indirect’ message and would have been ‘much more serious’ if sent directly to the complainant’s phone.