Campaigners warn Aquind plans will still have 'adverse' affect on South Downs National Park

CAMPAIGNERS have warned latest plans to bring electricity from France to the UK will still have an 'adverse' affect on a national park, despite the proposal of a new converter site.

Tuesday, 14th April 2020, 4:44 pm
Updated Tuesday, 14th April 2020, 6:42 pm
An artist's impression of how the Aquind interconnector will look.

The Hampshire branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has called for 'a more industrial site' to be used for a converter station for the Aquind interconnector, rather than one just outside the boundary of the South Downs National Park.

If approved by a government inspector at a later date the Aquind scheme will deliver power from France, with cables coming to land in Eastney in Portsmouth and travelling through the city before reaching a station further north.

Read More

Read More
Aquind electrical interconnector project which could see trench dug through Port...

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Previously a site next to an existing converter station at Lovedean had been proposed, however, the latest plans have singled out a location west of the Lovedean site - still outside the national park.

However, the CPRE believes the newest iteration will still change the 'rural character' of the area.

Christopher Napier, of CPRE Hampshire’s planning group, said: 'The proposed development site is west of the Lovedean substation but is surrounded on three sides by the South Downs National Park, a nationally designated landscape, which in places is only 200 to 300 metres away.

'So, the site is very much within the setting of the national park. The Monarch's Way long distance trail passes close by.

'The proposed converter station includes two converter halls, each measuring 90 metres in length, 50 metres in width and, notably, 22 to 26 metres in height. These would be very large buildings, with a height well in excess of even the largest agricultural buildings and mature trees. So, disguise would not be possible.

'Buildings of this massive scale and utilitarian appearance in this location would have a major adverse impact on the setting of the national park. The landscape would be changed from an essentially rural character to one which is far more industrial.

'Views from the national park and Monarch's Way would become dominated by these buildings and accompanying infrastructure.

'So, we continue to maintain that another, more industrial, site needs to be found.'

Aquind declined to comment.

A message from the Editor

Thank you for reading this story on While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to and enjoy unlimited access to local news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit our Subscription page now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.