Convict claims '˜sex discrimination' after Hampshire police reject job application
A MAN with a firearm conviction blamed sex discrimination when police turned down his job application.
The jobseeker, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has convictions for offences of criminal damage and burglary, possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear and violence and arson.
He was variously sentenced to terms in custody totalling six years.
When he applied to Hampshire Constabulary to become a force enquiry centre officer, the force rejected his bid.
He took his case to an employment tribunal, claiming as more men committed crime than women, the force was indirectly discriminating.
Portsmouth Traffic: M27 between junctions 11 and 12 closed throughout August amid footbridge repairs with A27 diversion in place
Thunderstorms in Portsmouth yellow weather warning: The Met Office forecast for the next three days in city, Fareham, Gosport, Havant and Waterlooville and Hampshire
'Manipulative' paedophile who went to Farnborough Railway Station with cans of Strongbow cider to meet girl, who he asked to travel 100 miles, busted by undercover police officer
‘I watched ten years of my children’s lives go up in flames': 'Traumatised' Paulsgrove mum of five launches fundraiser to find family new home after they 'lost everything' in bedroom fire
Fareham pensioner couple 'devastated' after hapless driver mistakenly trashes garden after confusing address for another property
But a judge struck out his appeal, with a further case at the Employment Tribunal Appeal in London, in November last year, also rejected by a judge.
The case has come to light after Employment Case Updates published a transcript on Tuesday.
It revealed the man argued the force never looked at the merits of his application, which later included a letter from his probation officer saying the officer trusted the man would not re-offend.
In the transcript, judge Jennifer Eady QC said: ‘I am unable to hold that it (the employment tribunal) was not entitled to reach this view on the material before it. I consider therefore that I am bound to dismiss the appeal.’
The judge in the employment tribunal had struck out the case before any evidence was heard as both the man and the police agreed there was no dispute of the facts.
But the man, who represented himself, then appealed this decision.
In a statement yesterday a Hampshire Constabulary spokesman said: ‘We adhere to the recruitment and vetting procedures that are set nationally to ensure we maintain the high standards required of us to protect and serve the public.’