Royal Navy admiral says new law protecting troops is 'lancing a long-standing boil'

A MOVE to protect troops from vexatious battlefield claims is ‘lancing a long-standing boil' and keeping a promise to the military, a military chief has said.

By Tom Cotterill
Wednesday, 10th March 2021, 7:00 am

Admiral Lord Alan West, who was head of the Royal Navy and also served as chief of defence intelligence with the Labour government, has warned against some bids to change the proposed legislation, arguing it threatened to wreck it.

The Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill, which has already cleared the Commons, seeks to limit false and historical allegations arising from deployments by introducing a statutory presumption against prosecution.

Read More

Read More
'Embarrassed' Royal Family will shrink in size after dramatic Oprah interview, ...

Sign up to our daily newsletter

Soldiers in Afghanistan running up to a Chinook helicopter for extraction.

This would make it exceptional for personnel to be prosecuted five years or more after an incident.

Speaking as peers began their detailed line-by-line scrutiny of the legislation, Lord West said: ‘I have no doubt whatsoever that this Bill is necessary. It’s lancing a long-standing boil and fulfilling a promise to our military.

‘It’s an issue that has proved too difficult to tackle time and time again, and it’s about time it was tackled. It must not go forward.’

He made his comments after a series of peers raised concerns over the presumption against prosecution.

Labour peer Lord Dubs called for it to be dropped from the legislation, insisting there were already safeguards against vexatious claims.

He also warned it could see personnel end up before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

‘It would be hazardous in the extreme to pass a Bill with measures in it which run the risk our servicemen and women could be prosecuted under the ICC,’ he said.

Lord Dubs said the reputation of UK armed forces was ‘second to none’ but feared they could ‘suffer’ from the proposed new laws.

Branding the Bill a ‘terrible piece of legislation’, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb argued it should be scrapped because it clashed with the whole point of the justice system, which was that ‘the guilty are found guilty and the innocent are found innocent’.

But former Tory justice minister Lord Faulks defended the Bill, saying it did not prevent investigations but would be welcomed by the armed forces.

Looking for the latest Royal Navy updates from Portsmouth? Join our new Royal Navy news Facebook group to keep up to date.

A message from the Editor, Mark Waldron

The News is more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription to support our journalism.

You can subscribe here for unlimited access to Portsmouth news online - as well as our new Puzzles section.