The Apprentice review: A new batch of candidates stuck in the dust-mottled shop window of Lord Sugar's fading high street giant

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
The Apprentice (BBC1, Thurs, 9pm) returned this week, and like a fading high street giant struggling in the face of competition from leaner, more agile online retailers, it is beginning to look threadbare and tired.

The latest batch of contenders, meanwhile, are like the bluebottles trapped in the shop window, as we watch them haplessly buzz about, bashing their heads fruitlessly against the glass.

Meanwhile, we wonder which will fall into the dust gathering on the windowsill of failure and which will finally make their way out of the skylight of business success and into the wide blue yonder with £250,000 of Lord Sugar's money.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

That's part of the problem with The Apprentice now, a show which refuses to innovate or change, a show which seems to think the height of communication is Lord Sugar's Amstrad emailer, a show whose insistence on presenting all the candidates as faceless corporate drones means it almost seems cruel watching them fail, fail, and then fail again.

Lord Alan Sugar and the series 19 candidates on this year's The Apprentice (Picture: BBC/Naked/Ray Burmiston/Rufina Breskin)Lord Alan Sugar and the series 19 candidates on this year's The Apprentice (Picture: BBC/Naked/Ray Burmiston/Rufina Breskin)
Lord Alan Sugar and the series 19 candidates on this year's The Apprentice (Picture: BBC/Naked/Ray Burmiston/Rufina Breskin)

I was sure one – Max, apparently – was actually a ghost, so pale, wan and silent was he. Surely he was the spectre of a previous candidate, condemned to roam the boardroom, jangling the buckles on his loafers as a warning others, intoning over and over again, “Thank you for the opportunity Lord Sugar”.

This week's opening episode followed the tried and tested formula of recent years, with Lord Sugar giving the candidates the benefit of his latest stand-up routine - “I'm looking for a Bezos, no a bozo” - before sending them off to lead a tourist excursion, this year in Austria.

Nadia put herself forward a project manager for one team, only be outvoted by Emma, whose ever-present furry hat – ideal for the Tyrolean Alps - seemed to be the deciding factor.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This meant that Nadia had a face on for the whole episode, determined to make things as difficult as possible and bad-mouthing Emma at every opportunity.

The candidates in the first episode of The Apprentice took guests on an excursion to a glacier in the Austrian Alps (Picture: BBC/FremantleMedia LtdThe candidates in the first episode of The Apprentice took guests on an excursion to a glacier in the Austrian Alps (Picture: BBC/FremantleMedia Ltd
The candidates in the first episode of The Apprentice took guests on an excursion to a glacier in the Austrian Alps (Picture: BBC/FremantleMedia Ltd

The fact that she described herself like the Arthur Scargill of the boardroom - “strategic and militant” - didn't really make her seem any better.

Of course, this being The Apprentice, there were epic failures with pricing and margins, ticket sales and a basic understanding of profit and loss.

And, this being The Apprentice, is made you wonder what inducements the production team offered the excursion customers to make them follow these clueless idiots around Innsbruck for the day.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I won't say who got fired – although you'll probably guess – it's enough to say that it could any one of about 10 of the candidates, as usual.

The Apprentice candidate Nadia (centre, in green) described herself like a corporate Arthur Scargill - "strategic and militant" (Picture: BBC/FremantleMedia Ltd)The Apprentice candidate Nadia (centre, in green) described herself like a corporate Arthur Scargill - "strategic and militant" (Picture: BBC/FremantleMedia Ltd)
The Apprentice candidate Nadia (centre, in green) described herself like a corporate Arthur Scargill - "strategic and militant" (Picture: BBC/FremantleMedia Ltd)

Over on BBC2, the companion show You're Fired continues to show literally 110 per cent more wit, verve and energy than its parent.

Tom Allen is a host with the perfect amount of love for the show with a healthy liking for snarky takedowns, while behind-the-scenes footage at least tries to humanise the candidates while the guests attempt to offer some justification for the corporate car crash we've all just witnessed.

It says something about the original show that you can watch You're Fired and come away feeling more entertained and more informed about both business and the candidates.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It's like one of those internet upstarts ready to take its parent down, while Lord Sugar and The Apprentice increasingly look like the Woolworths of linear TV – with the pick and mix gathering a layer of dust and bargain bin full of candidates.

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

News you can trust since 1877
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice