New research highlights fraud risks to business

Experts say fraud is costing businesses dear
Experts say fraud is costing businesses dear
Morning weather and travel

TRAVEL: Cloudy weather to hit Portsmouth as roads remain clear

0
Have your say

BUSINESSES and organisations in the UK are facing a fraud epidemic, with fraudsters increasingly taking advantage of technology and corporate inaction, according to new research.

The findings from national audit, tax and advisory firm Crowe Clark Whitehill, together with the University of Portsmouth’s Centre for Counter Fraud Studies, suggests that fraud is costing the UK £125bn each year.

The Financial Cost of Fraud 2017 report shows that annual losses as a result of fraud and error are now at the highest level ever recorded.

Since the recession in 2008 there has been a 43 per cent increase – up from 4.57 per cent of business expenditure to 6.54 per cent.

Jim Gee, head of forensics and counter-fraud at Crowe Clark Whitehill, said: ‘Fraud is a pernicious problem which affects every area of society.

‘Businesses are less financially stable and profitable; the quality of public services is diminished; and even charities do not get the full benefit of donations which are made.

‘Organisations constantly analyse costs and seek to reduce them to the point of optimal efficiency, but fraud is being overlooked.

‘The complexity of business systems and the decrease in moral conscience that technological, rather than face-to-face, interactions have bred, combined with a lack of investment in tackling fraud, have created an epidemic.’

The report is based on research looking at 19 years of data, where total losses have been measured in an accurate and statistically valid way.

The dataset covers loss measurement exercises in different countries and across many sectors. The total value of the expenditure where losses have been measured is over £13.2 trillion.

The latest government crime statistics – released in January – show that fraud and cyber-crime now represents almost half of all crime in the UK.

However, the report stresses that a pro-active counter-fraud approach can stem the flow of criminal abuse.

Mr Gee said: ‘The sums involved are huge.

‘Organisations’ behaviour towards measuring and countering fraud can be the difference between a mediocre annual performance and stable growth.

‘Businesses can no longer afford to bury their heads in the sand.

‘However, there is good news. The evidence revealed in this report shows that losses can be reduced, and this provides a real opportunity.

‘Private companies can gain a competitive advantage if the cost of fraud is reduced; public expenditure reductions can be less painful; and the charity sector can increase the resources it has available to deliver on important charitable initiatives.

‘Ensuring that organisations are properly protected against fraud could provide a £50bn shot in the arm for the UK economy.’

Mark Button, director of the Centre for Counter Fraud Studies at the University of Portsmouth, said: ‘This report shows the real value of academic research, highlighting a business cost which is sometimes overlooked, and providing an evidence base for action.

‘In a post-Brexit world, UK organisations need to be as efficient as possible and properly protect themselves against fraud to minimise this unnecessary cost.’